Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 14.0 points higher (52.4 vs 38.4) but costs 3.6× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $1608; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 38.4, and Mistral Large 4 Preview when 38.4 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.4 | 52.4 | +36.5% Muse Wonder (Max) is 36.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,607.86 | $5,786.78 | +259.9% Muse Wonder (Max) is 3.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.73s | 40.70s | +58.2% Muse Wonder (Max) is 58.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.36 / $4.18 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Mistral Large 4 Preview: 36.5% more intelligence, 259.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 58.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Mistral Large 4 PreviewMuse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill