Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral or Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 17.0 points higher (38.4 vs 21.4) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1608 vs $1145; both premium class). Pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning).
| Metric | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.4 | 21.4 | −44.3% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 44.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,607.86 | $1,145.36 | −28.8% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 28.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.12s | 112.14s | +313.5% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 313.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.36 / $4.18 | $0.60 / $3.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) vs Mistral Large 4 Preview: 44.3% less intelligence, 28.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 313.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Mistral Large 4 PreviewQwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4/qwen3-6-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4/qwen3-6-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill