Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 13.2 points higher (38.4 vs 25.2) but costs 3.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1608 vs $428; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when you need intelligence above 25.2, and Qwen3.7 Plus when 25.2 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.4 | 25.2 | −34.4% Qwen3.7 Plus is 34.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,607.86 | $427.73 | −73.4% Qwen3.7 Plus is 73.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.45s | 46.21s | +81.6% Qwen3.7 Plus is 81.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.36 / $4.18 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Mistral Large 4 Preview: 34.4% less intelligence, 73.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 81.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Mistral Large 4 PreviewQwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill