Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Which is better for the money: Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Mistral Large 4 Preview: 3.6% more intelligence, 77.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 98.4% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.4 | 39.8 | +3.6% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 3.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,607.86 | $362.72 | −77.4% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 77.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.45s | 50.49s | +98.4% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 98.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.36 / $4.18 | $0.15 / $0.47 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Mistral Large 4 PreviewQwen3.8-Flash-NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4/qwen3-8-flash-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4/qwen3-8-flash-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill