Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 27.6 points higher (38.4 vs 10.8) but costs 6.9× as much to run the benchmark ($1608 vs $233; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when you need intelligence above 10.8, and Trinity Large Thinking when 10.8 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.4 | 10.8 | −71.9% Trinity Large Thinking is 71.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,607.86 | $232.95 | −85.5% Trinity Large Thinking is 85.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.12s | 8.30s | −69.4% Trinity Large Thinking is 69.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.36 / $4.18 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs Mistral Large 4 Preview: 71.9% less intelligence, 85.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 69.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Mistral Large 4 PreviewTrinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-large-4/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill