Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 33.9 points higher (48.1 vs 14.2) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($2000 vs $1264; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mistral Medium 3.5.
| Metric | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.2 | 48.1 | +238.7% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 3.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,263.80 | $2,000.35 | +58.3% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 58.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.77s | 75.86s | +326.9% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 326.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $7.50 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs Mistral Medium 3.5: 238.7% more intelligence, 58.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 326.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Mistral Medium 3.5Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-medium-3-5/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-medium-3-5/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill