Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral or Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) vs Mistral Medium 3.5: 173.9% more intelligence, 6.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 3.5% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.2 | 38.9 | +173.9% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 2.7× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,263.80 | $1,184.90 | −6.2% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 6.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.96s | 17.34s | −3.5% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 3.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $7.50 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Mistral Medium 3.5Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-medium-3-5/muse-spark-open · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-medium-3-5/muse-spark-open?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill