Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Medium 3.5 scores 5.0 points higher (14.2 vs 9.2) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($1264 vs $663; both premium class). Pick Mistral Medium 3.5 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.2 | 9.2 | −35.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 35.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,263.80 | $662.85 | −47.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 47.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.57s | 7.71s | −56.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 56.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $7.50 | $0.50 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.2% less intelligence, 47.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 56.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Mistral Medium 3.5Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-medium-3-5/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-medium-3-5/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill