Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Medium 3.5 scores 3.4 points higher (14.2 vs 10.8) but costs 5.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1264 vs $233; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Medium 3.5 when you need intelligence above 10.8, and Trinity Large Thinking when 10.8 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.2 | 10.8 | −23.9% Trinity Large Thinking is 23.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,263.80 | $232.95 | −81.6% Trinity Large Thinking is 81.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.96s | 8.30s | −53.8% Trinity Large Thinking is 53.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $7.50 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs Mistral Medium 3.5: 23.9% less intelligence, 81.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 53.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Mistral Medium 3.5Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-medium-3-5/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-medium-3-5/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill