Mistral Small 3.2 vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Mistral Small 3.2 by Mistral or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 41.1 points higher (48.1 vs 7.0) but costs 16× as much to run the benchmark ($2000 vs $122; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 7.0, and Mistral Small 3.2 when 7.0 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Small 3.2 | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 7.0 | 48.1 | +587.1% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 6.9× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $121.78 | $2,000.35 | +1542.6% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 16× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.35s | 71.36s | +528.7% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 528.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.07 / $0.20 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs Mistral Small 3.2: 587.1% more intelligence, 1542.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 528.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Small 3.2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Mistral Small 3.2Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-small-3-2/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-small-3-2/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill