Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) by Mistral or Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) scores 33.8 points higher (45.1 vs 11.3) but costs 39× as much to run the benchmark ($1655 vs $42.5; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 11.3, and Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) when 11.3 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.3 | 45.1 | +299.1% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 4.0× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $42.50 | $1,655.27 | +3794.8% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 39× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.16s | 29.49s | +94.5% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 94.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning): 299.1% more intelligence, 3794.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 94.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-small-4/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-small-4/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill