Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) by Mistral or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 41.1 points higher (52.4 vs 11.3) but costs 136× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $42.5; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 11.3, and Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) when 11.3 is enough.
| Metric | Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.3 | 52.4 | +363.7% Muse Wonder (Max) is 4.6× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $42.50 | $5,786.78 | +13516.0% Muse Wonder (Max) is 136× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.50s | 41.43s | +185.7% Muse Wonder (Max) is 185.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning): 363.7% more intelligence, 13516.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 185.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mistral-small-4/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mistral-small-4/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill