Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs Muse Wonder (High)
Which is better for the money: Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta or Muse Wonder (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (High) scores 6.4 points higher (40.5 vs 34.1) but costs 37× as much to run the benchmark ($3520 vs $95.7; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (High) when you need intelligence above 34.1, and Muse Ember (Xhigh) when 34.1 is enough.
| Metric | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Muse Wonder (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.1 | 40.5 | +18.8% Muse Wonder (High) is 18.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $95.73 | $3,520.18 | +3577.2% Muse Wonder (High) is 37× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.48s | 31.44s | +231.6% Muse Wonder (High) is 231.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (High) vs Muse Ember (Xhigh): 18.8% more intelligence, 3577.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 231.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Wonder (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) scores 56.40 for $3360.
Muse Ember (Xhigh)Muse Wonder (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-ember-xhigh/muse-wonder-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-ember-xhigh/muse-wonder-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill