Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta or Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) vs Muse Ember (Xhigh): 65.4% less intelligence, 1510.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 46.4% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.1 | 11.8 | −65.4% Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B… is 65.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $95.73 | $1,541.98 | +1510.8% Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B… is 16× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.27s | 12.11s | +46.4% Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B… is 46.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.60 / $2.70 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
Muse Ember (Xhigh)Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-ember-xhigh/nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-ember-xhigh/nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill