Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta or Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) vs Muse Ember (Xhigh): 41.1% less intelligence, 2396.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 556.6% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.1 | 20.1 | −41.1% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 41.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $95.73 | $2,390.04 | +2396.6% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 25× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.48s | 62.25s | +556.6% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 556.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
Muse Ember (Xhigh)Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-ember-xhigh/qwen3-8-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-ember-xhigh/qwen3-8-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill