Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta or Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) vs Muse Ember (Xhigh): 70.7% less intelligence, 2659.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 80.7% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.1 | 10.0 | −70.7% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 70.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $95.73 | $2,641.61 | +2659.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 28× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.89s | 14.26s | +80.7% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 80.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
Muse Ember (Xhigh)Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-ember-xhigh/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-ember-xhigh/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill