Muse Glimmer (High) vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta or Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) scores 16.2 points higher (33.7 vs 17.5) but costs 12× as much to run the benchmark ($1737 vs $146; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 17.5, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 17.5 is enough.
| Metric | Muse Glimmer (High) | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 17.5 | 33.7 | +92.6% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 92.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $145.77 | $1,737.18 | +1091.7% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 12× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.78s | 20.40s | −17.7% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 17.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs Muse Glimmer (High): 92.6% more intelligence, 1091.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 17.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Muse Glimmer (High)Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-glimmer/muse-spark-1-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-glimmer/muse-spark-1-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill