Muse Glimmer (High) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 30.6 points higher (48.1 vs 17.5) but costs 14× as much to run the benchmark ($2000 vs $146; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 17.5, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 17.5 is enough.
| Metric | Muse Glimmer (High) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 17.5 | 48.1 | +174.9% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 2.7× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $145.77 | $2,000.35 | +1272.3% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 14× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.78s | 75.86s | +206.1% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 206.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs Muse Glimmer (High): 174.9% more intelligence, 1272.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 206.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Muse Glimmer (High)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-glimmer/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-glimmer/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill