Muse Glimmer (High) vs Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta or Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) scores 21.4 points higher (38.9 vs 17.5) but costs 8.1× as much to run the benchmark ($1185 vs $146; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 17.5, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 17.5 is enough.
| Metric | Muse Glimmer (High) | Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 17.5 | 38.9 | +122.3% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 2.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $145.77 | $1,184.90 | +712.9% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 8.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.76s | 17.34s | −30.0% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 30.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) vs Muse Glimmer (High): 122.3% more intelligence, 712.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 30.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Muse Glimmer (High)Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-glimmer/muse-spark-open · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-glimmer/muse-spark-open?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill