Muse Glimmer (High) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 34.9 points higher (52.4 vs 17.5) but costs 40× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $146; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 17.5, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 17.5 is enough.
| Metric | Muse Glimmer (High) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 17.5 | 52.4 | +199.4% Muse Wonder (Max) is 3.0× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $145.77 | $5,786.78 | +3869.8% Muse Wonder (Max) is 40× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.78s | 40.70s | +64.2% Muse Wonder (Max) is 64.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Muse Glimmer (High): 199.4% more intelligence, 3869.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 64.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Muse Glimmer (High)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-glimmer/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-glimmer/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill