Muse Glimmer (High) vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct

Muse Glimmer (High) vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetaMuse Glimmer (High)Off the frontier
Intelligence
17.50
Total cost
$146
AlibabaQwen3 30B A3B 2507 InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricMuse Glimmer (High)Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)17.57.5−57.1% Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 In… is 57.1% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$145.77Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)24.87s3.42s−86.2% Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 In… is 86.2% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $1.20$0.10 / $0.30
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerMuse Glimmer (High): what beats itQwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-glimmer/qwen3-30b-a3b-2507 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-glimmer/qwen3-30b-a3b-2507?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill