Muse Glimmer (High) vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max scores 22.7 points higher (40.2 vs 17.5) but costs 22× as much to run the benchmark ($3172 vs $146; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 Max when you need intelligence above 17.5, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 17.5 is enough.
| Metric | Muse Glimmer (High) | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 17.5 | 40.2 | +129.7% Qwen3.8 Max is 2.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $145.77 | $3,172.37 | +2076.3% Qwen3.8 Max is 22× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.79s | 64.17s | +158.9% Qwen3.8 Max is 158.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 Max vs Muse Glimmer (High): 129.7% more intelligence, 2076.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 158.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Muse Glimmer (High)Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-glimmer/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-glimmer/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill