Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh): 17.5% more intelligence, 20.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 4.6% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.7 | 39.6 | +17.5% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 17.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,737.18 | $1,385.40 | −20.3% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 20.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.59s | 20.60s | −4.6% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 4.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-1/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-1/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill