Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) scores 7.2 points higher (33.7 vs 26.5) but costs 7.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1990 vs $283; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 26.5, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when 26.5 is enough.
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.7 | 26.5 | −21.4% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 21.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,989.54 | $282.51 | −85.8% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 85.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.52s | 6.33s | −70.6% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 70.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh): 21.4% less intelligence, 85.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 70.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-1/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-1/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill