Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta or Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) scores 20.9 points higher (33.7 vs 12.8) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1527 vs $1319; both premium class). Pick Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning).
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.7 | 12.8 | −62.0% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 62.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,527.49 | $1,318.62 | −13.7% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 13.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.59s | 17.13s | −20.7% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 20.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh): 62.0% less intelligence, 13.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 20.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-1/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-1/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill