Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B

Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetaMuse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Off the frontier
Intelligence
33.70
Total cost
$1737
AlibabaQwen2.5 Instruct 72BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricMuse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Qwen2.5 Instruct 72BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)33.77.7−77.2% Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B is 77.2% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$1,737.18Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)21.59s22.76s+5.4% Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B is 5.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.25 / $4.25$0.47 / $0.49
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerMuse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh): what beats itQwen2.5 Instruct 72B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-1/qwen2-5-72b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-1/qwen2-5-72b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill