Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta or Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) scores 15.3 points higher (33.7 vs 18.4) but costs 2.1× as much to run the benchmark ($1990 vs $941; both premium class). Pick Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning).
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.7 | 18.4 | −45.4% Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Re… is 45.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,989.54 | $940.97 | −52.7% Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Re… is 52.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.52s | 65.86s | +206.0% Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Re… is 206.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $0.60 / $3.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh): 45.4% less intelligence, 52.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 206.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-1/qwen3-5-397b-a17b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-1/qwen3-5-397b-a17b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill