Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta or Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) scores 12.3 points higher (33.7 vs 21.4) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1737 vs $1145; both premium class). Pick Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning).
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.7 | 21.4 | −36.5% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 36.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,737.18 | $1,145.36 | −34.1% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 34.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.27s | 111.40s | +423.7% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 423.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $0.60 / $3.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh): 36.5% less intelligence, 34.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 423.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-1/qwen3-6-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-1/qwen3-6-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill