Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) by Meta or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) scores 29.5 points higher (50.6 vs 21.1) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($548 vs $247; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 50.6 | 21.1 | −58.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 58.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $548.07 | $247.26 | −54.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 54.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 22.53s | 6.61s | −70.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 70.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh): 58.3% less intelligence, 54.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 70.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) scores 45.60 for $240.
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-1/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-1/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill