Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) by Meta or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) scores 24.2 points higher (34.3 vs 10.1) but costs 3.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1737 vs $476; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) when you need intelligence above 10.1, and Qwen3 Coder Next when 10.1 is enough.
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 10.1 | −70.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 70.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,737.18 | $476.03 | −72.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 72.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 5.52s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh): 70.6% less intelligence, 72.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Astra (low) scores 46.00 for $1537.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-1/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-1/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill