Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs Ring-2.6-1T
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta or Ring-2.6-1T by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) scores 17.1 points higher (33.7 vs 16.6) but costs 3.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1737 vs $576; both premium class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 16.6, and Ring-2.6-1T when 16.6 is enough.
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Ring-2.6-1T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.7 | 16.6 | −50.7% Ring-2.6-1T is 50.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,737.18 | $575.60 | −66.9% Ring-2.6-1T is 66.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.59s | 24.04s | +11.3% Ring-2.6-1T is 11.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $0.30 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Ring-2.6-1T vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh): 50.7% less intelligence, 66.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 11.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Ring-2.6-1T is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Ring-2.6-1TToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-1/ring-2-6-1t · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-1/ring-2-6-1t?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill