Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs Solar Mini 4
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta or Solar Mini 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) scores 9.6 points higher (33.7 vs 24.1) but costs 3.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1737 vs $502; both premium class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 24.1, and Solar Mini 4 when 24.1 is enough.
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Solar Mini 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.7 | 24.1 | −28.5% Solar Mini 4 is 28.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,737.18 | $502.02 | −71.1% Solar Mini 4 is 71.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.10s | 27.46s | +43.8% Solar Mini 4 is 43.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $0.10 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Solar Mini 4 vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh): 28.5% less intelligence, 71.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 43.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Solar Mini 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Solar Mini 4Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-1/solar-mini4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-1/solar-mini4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill