Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Qwen3.7 Max vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh): 25.5% less intelligence, 64.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 21.1% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.6 | 29.5 | −25.5% Qwen3.7 Max is 25.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,385.40 | $2,277.12 | +64.4% Qwen3.7 Max is 64.4% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.09s | 16.63s | −21.1% Qwen3.7 Max is 21.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-2/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-2/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill