Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta or Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh): 49.0% less intelligence, 17.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 30.7% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.6 | 20.2 | −49.0% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 49.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,714.78 | $2,022.49 | +17.9% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 17.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.96s | 13.84s | −30.7% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 30.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-2/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-2/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill