Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta or Qwen3.8 Max (0902) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores 5.8 points higher (45.4 vs 39.6) but costs 3.6× as much to run the benchmark ($4935 vs $1385; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) when you need intelligence above 39.6, and Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) when 39.6 is enough.
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.6 | 45.4 | +14.6% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 14.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,385.40 | $4,934.79 | +256.2% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 3.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.60s | 64.02s | +210.8% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 210.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh): 14.6% more intelligence, 256.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 210.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-2/qwen3-8-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-2/qwen3-8-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill