Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta or Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) scores 6.2 points higher (45.1 vs 38.9) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1655 vs $1185; both premium class). Pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Spark Open (Xhigh).
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 38.9 | −13.7% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 13.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,655.27 | $1,184.90 | −28.4% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 28.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 30.45s | 16.47s | −45.9% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 45.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh): 13.7% less intelligence, 28.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 45.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh/muse-spark-open · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh/muse-spark-open?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill