Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta or Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) scores 11.4 points higher (45.1 vs 33.7) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($2359 vs $1459; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh).
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 33.7 | −25.3% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 25.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,358.74 | $1,458.94 | −38.1% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 38.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.35s | 61.13s | +115.6% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 115.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh): 25.3% less intelligence, 38.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 115.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh/qwen3-8-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh/qwen3-8-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill