Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta or Qwen3.8 Max (0902) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max): 5.6% less intelligence, 146.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 25.4% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 48.1 | 45.4 | −5.6% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 5.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,000.35 | $4,934.79 | +146.7% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 2.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 84.79s | 63.23s | −25.4% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 25.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-3/qwen3-8-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-1-3/qwen3-8-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill