Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) by Meta or Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) vs Muse Spark Open (Xhigh): 13.4% less intelligence, 12.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 248.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) | Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.9 | 33.7 | −13.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 13.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,184.90 | $1,336.09 | +12.8% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 12.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.05s | 59.47s | +248.8% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 248.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-open/qwen3-8-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-open/qwen3-8-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill