Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) by Meta or Qwen3.8 27B (Low) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) scores 12.7 points higher (38.9 vs 26.2) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($1185 vs $1060; both premium class). Pick Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.8 27B (Low).
| Metric | Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) | Qwen3.8 27B (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.9 | 26.2 | −32.6% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 32.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,184.90 | $1,060.08 | −10.5% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 10.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.45s | 55.17s | +235.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 235.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Low) vs Muse Spark Open (Xhigh): 32.6% less intelligence, 10.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 235.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)Qwen3.8 27B (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-open/qwen3-8-27b-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-open/qwen3-8-27b-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill