Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Which is better for the money: Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) by Meta or Qwen3.8 Max (0902) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores 6.5 points higher (45.4 vs 38.9) but costs 4.2× as much to run the benchmark ($4935 vs $1185; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) when you need intelligence above 38.9, and Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) when 38.9 is enough.
| Metric | Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.9 | 45.4 | +16.7% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 16.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,184.90 | $4,934.79 | +316.5% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 4.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.34s | 64.05s | +269.4% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 269.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $4.25 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Muse Spark Open (Xhigh): 16.7% more intelligence, 316.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 269.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-open/qwen3-8-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-spark-open/qwen3-8-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill