Muse Wonder (Max) vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta or Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 34.2 points higher (52.4 vs 18.2) but costs 6.5× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $896; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 18.2, and Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) when 18.2 is enough.
| Metric | Muse Wonder (Max) | Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.4 | 18.2 | −65.3% Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reas… is 65.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,786.78 | $896.39 | −84.5% Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reas… is 84.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 45.32s | 46.94s | +3.6% Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reas… is 3.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.38 / $2.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) vs Muse Wonder (Max): 65.3% less intelligence, 84.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 3.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Muse Wonder (Max)Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-wonder/qwen3-6-35b-a3b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-wonder/qwen3-6-35b-a3b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill