Muse Wonder (Max) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta or Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 32.2 points higher (52.4 vs 20.2) but costs 4.6× as much to run the benchmark ($9244 vs $2022; both flagship class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 20.2, and Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) when 20.2 is enough.
| Metric | Muse Wonder (Max) | Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.4 | 20.2 | −61.5% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 61.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $9,243.80 | $2,022.49 | −78.1% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 78.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.92s | 14.28s | −69.6% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 69.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) vs Muse Wonder (Max): 61.5% less intelligence, 78.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 69.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 57.60 for $8708.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Muse Wonder (Max)Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/muse-wonder/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/muse-wonder/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill