Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

NVIDIANemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
10.30
Total cost
-
Multiverse ComputingQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Off the frontier
Intelligence
26.70
Total cost
$246
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)10.326.7+159.2% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 2.6× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$246.48— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.65s15.88s+36.3% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 36.3% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.40 / $1.36$0.11 / $0.33
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning: what beats itQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b/quasar-438b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b/quasar-438b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill