NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA or Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Depends on your budget
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) scores 3.8 points higher (12.7 vs 8.9) but costs 3.7× as much to run the benchmark ($234 vs $63.7; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 8.9, and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoni… when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.9 | 12.7 | +42.7% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 42.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $63.74 | $233.56 | +266.4% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 3.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.33s | 20.83s | +101.6% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 101.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.05 / $0.20 | $0.23 / $2.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning): 42.7% more intelligence, 266.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 101.6% slower end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill