NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA or Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) scores 6.7 points higher (15.6 vs 8.9) but costs 10× as much to run the benchmark ($661 vs $63.7; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 8.9, and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoni… when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.9 | 15.6 | +75.3% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 75.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $63.74 | $661.29 | +937.5% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 10× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.10s | 21.24s | +110.3% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 110.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.05 / $0.20 | $0.40 / $3.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning): 75.3% more intelligence, 937.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 110.3% slower end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning/qwen3-5-122b-a10b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning/qwen3-5-122b-a10b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill