NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs Ring-2.6-1T
Which is better for the money: NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA or Ring-2.6-1T by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Ring-2.6-1T scores 7.7 points higher (16.6 vs 8.9) but costs 9.0× as much to run the benchmark ($576 vs $63.7; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Ring-2.6-1T when you need intelligence above 8.9, and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoni… when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) | Ring-2.6-1T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.9 | 16.6 | +86.5% Ring-2.6-1T is 86.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $63.74 | $575.60 | +803.0% Ring-2.6-1T is 9.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.29s | 24.22s | +135.4% Ring-2.6-1T is 135.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.05 / $0.20 | $0.30 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Ring-2.6-1T vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning): 86.5% more intelligence, 803.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 135.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Ring-2.6-1T is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)Ring-2.6-1TToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning/ring-2-6-1t · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning/ring-2-6-1t?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill