Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 16.7 points higher (29.5 vs 12.8) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1965 vs $1319; both premium class). Pick Qwen3.7 Max when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning).
| Metric | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.8 | 29.5 | +130.5% Qwen3.7 Max is 2.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,318.62 | $1,964.83 | +49.0% Qwen3.7 Max is 49.0% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.78s | 16.53s | −1.5% Qwen3.7 Max is 1.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $0.90 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Qwen3.7 Max vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning): 130.5% more intelligence, 49.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill