Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max scores 27.4 points higher (40.2 vs 12.8) but costs 2.4× as much to run the benchmark ($3172 vs $1319; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Qwen3.8 Max when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning).
| Metric | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.8 | 40.2 | +214.1% Qwen3.8 Max is 3.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,318.62 | $3,172.37 | +140.6% Qwen3.8 Max is 2.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.13s | 62.08s | +262.4% Qwen3.8 Max is 262.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $0.90 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 Max vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning): 214.1% more intelligence, 140.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 262.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill