Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) scores 5.0 points higher (12.8 vs 7.8) but costs 10× as much to run the benchmark ($1319 vs $131; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 7.8, and Solar Pro 3 when 7.8 is enough.
| Metric | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.8 | 7.8 | −39.1% Solar Pro 3 is 39.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,318.62 | $131.21 | −90.0% Solar Pro 3 is 90.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.68s | 18.27s | +9.5% Solar Pro 3 is 9.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $0.90 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning): 39.1% less intelligence, 90.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 9.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill